A UNANIMOUS vote of no confidence has been passed against Vauxhall MP Kate Hoey by her constituency party members.
Hoey was censured for “colluding with Nigel Farage” by members angry at her repeated voting with the Conservatives on Brexit.
A motion to suspend her from the Parliamentary Labour Party was passed with 42 votes in favour, none against and three abstentions, with nobody speaking in her favour.
READ MORE: Labour MP condemned for Good Friday Agreement attack
Hoey was re-elected last year on a manifesto that “explicitly rejected Theresa May’s approach to Brexit”, the motion stated, and she pledged to endorse Labour’s plans in a letter to constituents.
Members were particularly furious she had voted with the Conservatives on last week’s Trade Bill, “propping up a failing government ... when Tory whips had made it clear that defeat could lead to an immediate General Election, an election which Labour is widely expected to win”.
The motion stated: “This CLP censures Kate Hoey MP for repeatedly reneging on those commitments, and ignoring the clearly stated views of her constituents and the national and local Labour Party.
“We believe the accumulation of her actions and statements over the years, culminating in her supporting this reactionary government and a Tory Brexit which will threaten jobs, peace in Northern Ireland and the future of the NHS, and undermine workers’ rights and environmental and other standards, cannot be deemed to be compatible with Labour’s core beliefs and values.”
Hoey had defended herself ahead of the motion in a letter to constituency party members, claiming “the idea there would have been a General Election if Labour MPs’ had supported the amendment is not true”.
She said: “In my view, the other amendment put forward by Tory back bench rebels was a backhand way of staying in the customs union – a position which would leave us subject to taking the rules from the EU.
“It would mean us not having a say and stopping us making our own independent trade deals and still being subject to the European court, ie Brexit in name only.
“This was not the position in the Labour manifesto on which I was re-elected.”
Speaking the morning after the vote, Labour London Mayor Sadiq Khan, who was a prominent Remain campaigner, told LBC: “There are 73 CLPs across London. They are autonomous bodies and they have expressed their view and they are clearly unhappy with Kate’s vote the other day when there was a possibility of the Government losing the vote, a vote of no confidence, possibly a General Election.
READ MORE: Sorry Scottish Labour, this is the truth about who ushered in Thatcher ...
“Kate Hoey’s views on Brexit are long-known and have been long-held. The concern that members have is that in this particular example there was the possibility of bringing the Government down and the job of HM Official Opposition is to be an opposition and to provide a government-in-waiting.”
Laura Parker, national co-ordinator of Momentum, called for the deselection of the four Labour MPs who rebelled on the Trade Bill vote: Hoey, Frank Field, John Mann and Graham Stringer.
She said: “We had a chance to bring down this chaotic Tory government and four Labour MPs stood in our way.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel