WIINNING a majority of Scottish constituencies at an election could be sufficient to open negotiations on independence, a former SNP deputy leader has claimed.
Jim Sillars, who was Alex Salmond’s deputy, said the move may be feasible if the UK Government continues to refuse Scotland permission to hold another legally binding referendum.
A Panelbase poll for The Sunday Times last week found that support for independence would grow to within touching distance of a majority in the event of a no-deal Brexit. However, the Prime Minister has refused to give Nicola Sturgeon the right to hold a second referendum.
A number of senior SNP figures have suggested that independence could come about without a referendum and Sturgeon has warned that May cannot deny Scotland a second vote.
Sillars told The Sunday Times yesterday that if the UK continues to block an independence referendum despite public support, there are “merits” in the idea that the SNP winning a majority of Scottish seats and votes at Westminster would act as the basis to begin negotiations.
His comments follow remarks by the SNP’s justice spokeswoman at Westminster Joanna Cherry who told a fringe meeting at her party conference last week a significant “democratic event” such as a General Election would be enough to declare independence.
The Edinburgh West MP said if Labour won the election, but without an outright majority, the SNP could demand the abolition of Trident or a Section 30 order as the “price of our support”.
She added: “Our aim is to make Scotland an independent country, but I would remind you that Scotland voted against that in 2014.
“There has to be a democratic event, and I choose those words wisely, it doesn’t have to necessarily be a referendum, it could be something else, like a General Election.
“But there has to be a democratic event. In the meantime we will do what we have always done as SNP politicians and push for more powers for Holyrood.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel