JUSTICE Secretary Humza Yousaf said language used in an internal police email on the deployment of female firearm officers is “utterly intolerable”.
An email seen by BBC Scotland asks that two female officers not be deployed together when a man is available, citing physical capacity and “a balance of testosterone”.
Police Scotland said the officer who sent the message earlier this year, then a temporary inspector, has apologised for the “unacceptable” wording.
The email reportedly read: “Im (sic) going to plunge in with both feet and open myself up to being accused of being sexist!
“For operational reasons I don’t want to see 2 x female officers deployed together when there are sufficient male staff on duty.
“This is based on my experience in the firearms and routine policing environment, other than the obvious differencies (sic) in physical capacity, it makes more sense from a search, balance of testosterone perspective.”
“If you want to discuss my door is open.”
It concludes: “Ladies, For the purpose of transparency I have included you in this email.
“Likewise if you want to discuss my door is always open.”
Yousaf told BBC Scotland: “That language is utterly intolerable.
“That is not the kind of language I would expect any police officer, junior or senior, to be using but it will be for the Chief Constable, undoubtedly, to investigate and we will leave that in his hands.”
Police Scotland has 572 Authorised Firearms Officers – 539 male and 33 female.
Two former female firearms officers are taking legal action against the Chief Constable on the grounds of discrimination.
Chief Superintendent Matt Richards, divisional commander for specialist services, said: “The email was dealt with immediately and the matter was investigated fully.
“The officer fully accepts the wording was unacceptable and does not meet our values of fairness, integrity and respect.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here