SPECULATION over the options that present themselves after the Commons’ meaningful vote on Theresa May’s Brexit deal on December 11 is reaching fever pitch.
That’s hardly surprising given the number and range of options that will spring up in the aftermath of the vote is huge. As we discovered while working on our graphic on pages four and five of today’s Sunday National, we could have filled most of our paper with the different scenarios that will face us. Thankfully, we restricted the options to a more sensible number.
What’s certain is that we will be entering uncharted territory in which almost anything can happen.
That includes the almost unprecedented collaboration among the parties at Holyrood, all but one of which will be joining forces to sign a motion calling for an alternative to May’s deal and rejecting the notion of leaving Europe without any deal at all. That Holyrood motion will be followed by an SNP attempt to achieve similar consensus among the opposition parties – and presumably some Tory rebels – at Westminster.
For a party pledged to make Scotland independent it could be said that the SNP is going to inordinate lengths to protect the UK as a whole from the disastrous consequences of a hard or no-deal Brexit.
Is it right to do so? The most persuasive argument in favour of the SNP tactic is that it’s the right thing to do. We may want to be independent but we do not wish to see our neighbours suffer economic disaster.
More pragmatically, many fear that a hard Brexit will be so brutal that voters will be put off considering independence.
Many in the independence movement are becoming impatient for another referendum.
But if the SNP’s stance is successful it will have saved those living north AND south of the Border from catastrophe, established a worldwide reputation for statesmanship and increased national self-confidence as we again consider taking our future into our own hands.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel