ROYAL Bank of Scotland is investigating allegations of cronyism after a whistleblower claimed the lender appointed a man to a top role on the basis that he is the friend of a senior staff member.
A source within the bank said RBS is looking into complaints that a man appointed team leader on the troubled Amethyst project does not have the requisite qualifications or experience for the role, and was given the job solely because he was friends with a head honcho.
The move is said to have sparked fury among colleagues, with one saying on condition of anonymity: “You would have at least Level 4 Financial Planning Diploma Certificate to be a team leader, if not level 6.
“The fact is he didn’t even know what an OEIC (open-ended investment company) was when he started the project.
“You could not expect to be a team leader without having this knowledge. There were times when his team wanted to challenge decisions but he had no knowledge and couldn’t.”
It is also alleged that the man was paid nearly double what those with qualifications were earning and, damningly, that more experienced and qualified staff were kicked off the project while he maintained his position.
RBS chief executive Ross McEwan was made aware of the situation in July, but the whistleblower is understood to have raised concerns that the investigation is not being taken seriously and has been delayed.
The bank said in a statement: “RBS takes whistleblowing very seriously.
“The bank was made aware of a series of allegations in July and is investigating them thoroughly.
“No conclusions have been reached at this stage but the appropriate action will be taken in the event that any of the allegations are substantiated.”
The Amethyst project was set up to carry out complex investment reviews of ISAs, funds, bonds, pensions and tax planning products.
The Financial Conduct Authority has rules in place that aim to stamp out nepotism and cronyism in the Square Mile, but it is unclear whether the City watchdog has been made aware of the situation.
The RBS source added: “It was another yes man put in place for the project overall.
“With no experience of investments, he wouldn’t even be offered one of the admin roles for the project in normal course of events.”
The damning revelations come just weeks after it was revealed that RBS was paying contractors £400 a day to stuff envelopes, typically a minimum wage role.
Under McEwan, the lender, still 62% owned by the Government, has pledged to cut costs and stamp out scandals.
Since the financial crisis, RBS has been dogged by furore surrounding the mis-selling of payment protection insurance (PPI), mortgage-backed securities and the mistreatment of small businesses.
In addition, McEwan has taken an axe to the RBS branch network as part of cost-cutting measures, resulting in hundreds of job losses.
RBS was been dropped from a list of the world’s most important banks last month, signifying that it will no longer be required to hold extra capital in case it fails.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) removed the state-owned lender from the list of global systemically important banks that it started publishing after the 2008 financial crisis.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here