FIREBRAND Labour MP Dennis Skinner has defended labelling an SNP MP a "piece of shit" in the Commons.
Skinner, who has served as MP for Bolsover for 48 years, said that he wanted to put the SNP "in their place" after Jeremy Corbyn was heckled from their benches during a debate on the Government's decision to pull the "meaningful vote" on the Prime Minister's Brexit deal.
The 86-year-old, who is widely known as "the Beast of Bolsover" for his uncompromising style, mouthed the insult at Glasgow South MP Stewart McDonald during the debate.
READ MORE: Labour MP calls SNP politician a 'piece of sh*t'
Skinner, speaking afterwards, said: "He attacks Jeremy Corbyn every time he stands up and I've told him before he is part of the opposition and he should concentrate on attacking the real enemy. I just put them in their place."
McDonald branded the Labour veteran a "thug" after the incident.
He tweeted: "A new parliamentary habit seems to be forming, whereby any time an SNP MP sat behind Dennis Skinner verbalises any frustration about what Jeremy Corbyn says, he angrily turns round to tell us off.
"He has just turned round and called me a 'piece of shit'. He has become a thug."
The SNP MP escalated the matter further by raising a point of order with Speaker John Bercow in the Commons.
McDonald said: "During proceedings earlier the leader of the opposition was opening his emergency debate when he had taken an intervention from a member of the Democratic Unionist Party, during the response from the leader of the opposition I said to my colleague [Marion Fellows] that I wished the leader of the opposition would answer a question.
"It then promoted [Dennis Skinner] to turn around to me and call me a piece of shit, Mr Speaker he then went on to defend that, telling a journalist that he was 'just putting me in my place'.
"As you know Mr Speaker I've no desire to raise this formally with you, I had hoped to deal with it informally as you suggested Mr Speaker, but given he shows no sign of having any regret about it can you just reaffirm that it's wrong and can you reaffirm that members on all sides should be able to go about this place without being on the tail end of that kind of abuse."
Bercow responded saying he "wasn't there" and "wouldn't presume to comment on a conversation I did not hear".
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel