PRESIDENT Donald Trump is facing legal challenges to his decision to use emergency powers to build a wall on the US border with Mexico.
The top two Democrats in Congress said they would use “every remedy available” to oppose what they cast as an unlawful measure.
Trump announced he was using emergency measure to secure more money for his long-promised wall on Friday, using an interpretation of his presidential powers that was condemned as unconstitutional.
In his emergency proclamation, Trump claimed the border was “a major entry point for criminals, gang members, and illicit narcotics” and one that threatens “core national security interests”. Illegal border crossings are down from a high of 1.6 million in 2000.
Trump signed the declaration to justify diverting billions of federal dollars from military construction and other purposes after Congress approved only a fraction of the money he had demanded.
Within hours, the first legal challenge –made by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) – against the declaration of national emergency was launched.
The stand-off over border funding had led to the longest government shutdown in history. To avoid another Trump reluctantly signed a funding Bill on Friday which included just $1.4 billion of the $5.7bn he had demanded for the wall.
“Sadly, we’ll be sued and sadly it will go through a process and happily we’ll win, I think,” he said at a news conference where he also claimed this was an attempt to make the process “faster” .
ACLU executive director Anthony Romero, said: “By the president’s very own admission, there is no national emergency. He just grew impatient and frustrated with Congress, and decided to move along his promise for a border wall ‘faster’.”
Some Democratic state attorneys general have also threatened to go to court over the decision. A liberal advocacy group, Public Citizen, sued on behalf of a nature reserve and three Texas landowners who have been told the wall may be constructed on their properties.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here