GLOBAL targets to limit climate change are unlikely to be met due to delays in changing the way people use land, according to new research.
The study, involving researchers from the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) and the University of Edinburgh, suggests that efforts to make land management less damaging to the climate need to be stepped up dramatically if high levels of climate change are to be avoided.
The 2015 Paris Agreement to limit average global temperature increases to 1.5C (2.7F) above pre-industrial levels relies heavily on changes in the management of agricultural land and forests around the world.
Many countries plan to prevent deforestation or establish new forests over large areas to absorb carbon dioxide from the air and to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture, changes which would remove up to 25% of the greenhouse gases released by human activity every year.
However, the new research shows that such changes in land use usually take decades to happen, far too slowly to help slow climate change to the agreed level.
Dr Calum Brown of KIT, lead author of the study, which is published in the journal Nature Climate Change, said: “The 195 countries that signed the Paris Agreement in 2015 set out a range of actions they would take to tackle climate change.
“In most cases little progress has been made in implementing these actions and often the situation has worsened in the last three years.
“Our research suggests that many of the plans for mitigation in the land system were unrealistic in the first place and now threaten to make the Paris target itself unachievable.”
The researchers argue that the slow rate of progress is an inevitable consequence of disconnected political priorities, delays in the adoption of new approaches by land managers and trade connections that drive deforestation in tropical countries.
Dr Peter Alexander, an author of the study from the University of Edinburgh, said: “Individual countries’ plans to accomplish the Paris Agreement are vague, almost certainly insufficient and unlikely to be implemented in full.
“Richer countries have not been leading the way, either in reducing their own emissions or in reducing the pressure on developing nations.
“We need to find rapid but realistic ways of changing human land use if we are to meet our climate change targets.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article