BRENDAN Rodgers last night defended the conduct of his Celtic players in the wake of their Betfred Cup final triumph - and aimed a thinly-veiled dig at his Aberdeen counterpart Derek McInnes for his behaviour at Hampden on Sunday.
Both McInnes, the Pittodrie manager, and Graeme Shinnie, his captain and midfielder, were critical of how Scott Brown and Mikael Lustig, the Parkhead players, acted towards the end of the game.
McInnes confronted Lustig on the pitch after his team had lost a fiercely-contested game 1-0 and accused him of trying to wind up Lewis Ferguson, his 19-year-old midfielder.
Shinnie, who has had a feud with Brown since the final league game of last season and refused to shake his opponent’s hand following the final whistle, afterwards accused both Celtic players of lacking class.
But Lustig later claimed that he was actually shouting at McInnes – who he said had mouthed off at him during the game – and Rodgers suggested that his opposite number had to accept that reaction after his actions.
“It is disappointing,” he said. “I didn’t see Mikael goad the boy Ferguson at all. I watched the game back when I went home. I don’t think there was any goading.
“If you look at us as a team and you look at our records, we are a very sporting team.. The players’ record from a discipline perspective is exemplary. So I can’t agree with that. I don’t go down the route that we lack any of those qualities. It is not something I would agree with.”
Rodgers added: “For some players, they will give it out and you have to be ready to take it.
“I also say that if you are a manager on the side of the field, and I say this generically, who gets involved with players if something comes back to you then you have to be ready to take that.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel